[Diaspora] Hyperspace visualization

[Brad Murray]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Dunham <alakoring at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually you did, on p. 238. (Most people prefer to use Dave over Tucker,
> but they're functionally the same.)
>

Well that's just fiction -- you are free to interpret the rules as you
please.


> I wonder how much this impacts play? It makes it hard to be lying in wait
> for someone (for good or bad reasons) because they could be heading to the
> other slipknot. It does mean that you could have consequences like
> Accidentally at Tucker, and be 10 AU from the station you wanted to reach.
>

A lot. If you want to intercept someone you need to have people at both
slipknots as well as anticipate their destination system. I bet a great Nav
roll could determine an enemy's destination, though, if you were close
enough to scan details.


> I assume you did have a reason for wanting two.
>

Symmetry, mostly.

-- 
Brad Murray (halfjack)
VSCA Publishing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phreeow.net/pipermail/diaspora_phreeow.net/attachments/20091220/ea1f0bbb/attachment.html>